Welcome back to Rockwater Reports, your trusted home for Real News!
Marking the first time in over fifty years that an Originalist (also known as Originalism) Conservative Textual based SCOTUS will be in power at the third co-equal branch of our government, it is a success that has been secured at SCOTUS that a majority of Citizens have yearned for decades to become reality.
Subsequent to over one hundred years of Socialist rulings that began with one of the worst President’s in our history, Woodrow Wilson, SCOTUS now will have a Six to Three majority can return to interpreting the law instead of creating it out of thin air via legislating “from the bench”.
To be forthright, SCOTUS 2020 is actually a five point five to three point five (5.5 to 3.5) majority since the Chief Justice has a proven time and time again that he is not faithful to the United States Constitution, often authoring SCOTUS rulings that are in effect Crimes Against The Constitution.
Unlike the untruthful bleak picture painted by Senate Democrats, Judge Amy Coney Barrett has led a life that should be admired by everyone in this country. As everyone with common sense knows, the Democrats in the United States Senate only attacked and besmirched Judge Barrett because they know that their fifty years of manipulating the Supreme Court are (finally) at an end!
Nevertheless, the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett now gives hope to everyone who has witnessed erosion of their Constitutional and documented Bill of Rights, specifically; Free Speech, Religious Liberty, Second Amendment rights, the murder of children Citizens, and many more.
As the judicial system in our country moves back to sanity, let us look at how we arrived here.
The History of Amy Coney Barrett:
Amy Coney Barrett is forty eight years old. She is one of the finest jurists in all history having graduated at the top of her class from Notre Dame Law School. Judge Barrett served s a law professor and appeals court judge before her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court in September 2020.
Returning to at Notre Dame Law School in 2002, Amy Coney Barrett became distinguished professor who was admired by Liberals, Conservatives and Independent students alike and beloved for her friendly, approachable yet professional demeanor.
Amy Coney Barrett served distinctively for three years on the bench for the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. This outstanding Conservative judge was nominated by President Donald Trump to replace recently Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the United States Supreme Court in subsequent to her passing on September 18, 2020.
Amy Coney Barrett and the Seventh Circuit:
Amy Coney Barrett was nominated by President Trump for a seat on U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in May 2017. The Seventh Circuit covers the geographic area of Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin. Some, including myself had hope Amy Coney Barrett would have been nominated for SCOTUS earlier in her career, but it was not to be and for good reason.
The nominations of Neal Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to serve on SCOTUS laid a foundation that effectively exposed the hypocrisy and hatred of our country when vile attacks were levied against both judges, with a complete fabrication of lies including sexual harassment against Brett Kavanaugh by the deceptive Democrats.
The Amy Coney Barrett September 2017 confirmation process further exposed the Democrats who attempted to assert that Judge Barrett was unqualified due to her Roman Catholic religious beliefs, something expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article VI, Clause 3. Corrupt California Senator Diane Feinstein even attacked Amy Coney Barrett at one point with the now infamous outburst “the dogma lives loudly within you.”
Despite these shameful behavioral displays, Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed in October 2017 by a fifty-five to forty-three vote. Three Democrats Joe Donnelly, Tim Kaine, and Joe Manchin crossed party lines to demonstrate their support of Amy Coney Barrett to join the Seventh Circuit.
Sadly, it was not expected that any Democrats will support Amy Coney Barrett and vote yes for her confirmation to join SCOTUS and so it is, all Senate Democrats voted no on this fine jurist. Shame on them, one and all.
Career Highlights of Amy Coney Barrett:
Subsequent to graduation, Amy Coney Barrett clerked for Judge Laurence Silberman of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Amy Coney Barrett also clerked for famous Conservative Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia.
Amy Coney Barrett worked successfully in the private sector from the late 1990’s to 2002 when, as mentioned above, she returned to Notre Dame Law School in 2002. Hard work yielded success when she became a full-tenured faculty member respected for legal expertise on both constitutional law and proper Originalist statutory interpretation (not legislating from the bench).
A popular professor, always known to help her students achieve success in the own right, Amy Coney Barrett was voted “Distinguished Professor of the Year” three times. Additionally Amy Coney Barrett sat on the Notre Dame Law School Diane and M.O. Miller Research Chair of Law from 2014-2017.
Amy Coney Barrett succeeded in forging a respected national profile for her staunch conservative and Catholic beliefs. Earning the respect of religious people and organizations, Amy Coney Barrett criticized President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandate that contraceptives be covered by health insurance plans as a “grave violation of religious freedom” signing a statement in 2012 that such was a violation of the Constitution.
On the subject of Stare Decisis, Amy Coney Barrett has stated clearly “I tend to agree with those who say that a justice’s duty is to the Constitution and that it is thus more legitimate for her to enforce her best understanding of the Constitution rather than a precedent she thinks clearly in conflict with it”.
When thinking of incorrect decisions that have been overturned, specifically Brown versus Board of Education (Separate but Equal) and Korematsu versus the United States (unconstitutional imprisonment of United States citizens in concentration camps), could anyone today argue with Amy Coney Barrett that both of these and other SCOTUS “Stare Decisis” decisions made in error required being overturned? I think not, proving that adherence to the United States Constitution overrides the concept of Stare Decisis
Although Amy Coney Barrett is a pro-life judge, she has spoken at length on the complex issues surrounding the Roe versus Wade topic. On the subject of abortion, Amy Coney Barrett’s view of Stare Decisis has triggered during her confirmation hearing where Democrats falsely contended that she intends to overturn the 1973 Roe versus Wade decision that legalized abortion. This despite stating in 2013 it was unlikely the landmark ruling would be overturned.
Judge Barrett does believe in the sanctity of life stating in 2015 letter she signed to Catholic Bishops that praised “the value of human life from conception to natural death” and “family founded on the indissoluble commitment of a man and a woman”.
Opinions and Interpretations:
In 2019, in a decision of Kanter versus Barr, Judge Barrett was the lone voice of dissent in a decision that prohibited a man convicted of a white-collar crime from possessing a firearm. “Founding legislatures did not strip felons of the right to bear arms simply because of their status as felons,” she wrote.
Barrett again dissented in 2020 when Cook County versus Wolf upheld blocking President Trump’s “Public Charge” rule that made it difficult for immigrants relying on public assistance to obtain green cards. Judge Barrett described the policy as “not unreasonable,” Judge Barrett insisted the courts are “not the vehicle” for resolving controversial policy disputes. This of course triggers the Democrats to no end since they have utilized, in fact abused the court system for over one hundred years when they were unable to pass legislation in Congress or State Legislatures.
In a opinion most agree with Judge Barrett wrote a 2017 article correctly criticized Chief Justice John Roberts’ upholding of the ACA more commonly known as ObamaCare. The characterization of the ObamaCare financial penalty imposed on those without health insurance as a tax, words not used in the statute itself, Judge Barrett correctly documented that “Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute”.
Supreme Court Sanity Success:
Amy Coney Barrett is President Trump’s third Supreme Court nomination. Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, now dovetailed with Judge Barrett effectively ensure that our rights as citizens will be protected, not a substitute for legislation made up out of thin air by activist liberal judges whom have severely damaged the rights of citizens regarding the Bill of Rights, Freedom of Speech, Religious Liberty, Second Amendment rights, and the murder of child Citizens.
This was a promise made, promise kept by President Trump that will virtually guarantee Supreme Court Sanity for many future generations to come!
We thank you for visiting and express our sincere gratitude for doing so!